Skip to main content

electronegativity scales and its advantages and numericals

electronegativity scales and its advantages and numericals

4.Sanderson's scale of electronegativity:
this scale is based upon new quantity called
stability ratio=E.D/E.Di

 stability ratio of an atom is defined as ratio of average electron density (E.D)  around the nucleus and it's ideal hypothetical electron density (E.Di)  which the atom would have if it work on inert atom.


stability ratio=E.D/E.Di

A/c to sanderson's stability ratio of an atom measure it's electronegativity
X(A) (sanderson) = E.D/E.Di

Electronegativity on pauling scale:

X(pauling) = 0.21(X(A)sanderson ratio) +0.77

5.Mulliken zaffee electronegativity scale:

Zaffee and his coworker extended the Mulliken definition and suggested that electronegativity  of an atom is different in different environment some of these factor which affect electronegativity are

1.Oxidation state:
 more is the oxidation state ,more is the attraction for electron,  hence more will be the electronegativity. so pb^+4 is more electronegativity than pb^+2.

2 .Hyberdistaion:
Hyberdistation also affect electronegativity.
sp^3  25℅ s character
sp^2  33.3℅ s character
sp     50℅ s character

s orbital are more penetrating (s>p>d>f)  so hybrid orbital with greater s character will be more electronegativity. so sp carbon atom is more electronegativity than sp^2 and sp^3 hybridisation of carbon atom.

4.Positive charge:
an atom with positive charge will attract electron more readily than a neutral atom .so positive charge atom are more electronegativity than neutral atom.

5.Bond order:
more is the bond order,  more will be the electronegativity.

eg. carbon of alkyne is more electronegativity than carbon atom of alkene.

numerical
Question1
The internuclear distance in Kcl is 3.14A°.calculate ionic radii of K+ and cl- using Pauling method?
ans
 zeff nuclear charge of K^+

K^+   1s^2  2s^2  2p^6  3s^2  3p^6
S= 7×0.35+8×0.85+2×1.00
S=11.25
zeff=Z-S=19-11.25=7.75

zeff nuclear charge of Cl^-

Cl^- 1s^2  2s^2  2p^6  3s^2  3p^6
S= 7×0.35+8×0.85+2×1.00
S=11.25
zeff=Z-S=17-11.25=5.75

now radius directly proportional to 1/zeff

r=C/zeff
r(k^+) = C/7.75
r(cl^-) =C/5.75

r(k^+) +r(cl^-) = 3.14A°
putting value
C/7.75+C/5.75=3.14A°
C =10.36



r(k^+) = C/7.75=10.36/7.75=1.34A°
r(cl^-) =C/5.75=10.36/5.75=1.80A°






Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Radial probability distribution curves

Radial probhjjhajajbability distribution curves:  The probability of finding the electron is given by the quantity  sie^2.By radial probability us probability of finding the electron within small Radial space around the nucleus. volume of spherical shell between radius r and r+dr =4πr^2 and probability of finding the electron will be 4πr^2dr sie^2. radial probability distribution curves are obtained by plotting radial probability at various distance from the nucleus . 1.Radial probability distribution curves for S orbital n=1, l= 0. distance from nucleus here A° is called angstrom. the probability of finding of electron in a shell is maximum at distance r=r° (r not)  which is 0.529 A° for H atom. diagram shows that probability plot for 2s has(two region of high probability)  or (two peaks)  separated by node. we conclude that  no.  of high probability region in S orbital = n no.  of node = ( n-1) 
Post a Comment
Read more

Radial probability distribution for p and d orbital, radial wave functions

Radial probability distribution for p and d orbital Radial and Angular wave function:  the radial part of wave function depends upon quantum no.  n and  l  and gives the distribution of electron w. r. t distance .it is governed mainly exponential term     e^-Zr/na°(a not)   here  e   based on natural log.  Z   Atomic number r     distance from nucleus  n    principal quantum no. or radial quantum           no.  a°    0.529A° for hydrogen  ( Bohr radii)  the exact mathematical expression for radial part of wave function for 1s or 2s and 2p orbitals. n= 1 ,l=0 s orbital    R(r) =2× (z/a°) ^3/2 ×(2-zr/a°) ×e^-zr/2a° n= 2 ,l=0 2s orbital    R(r) = (z/a°) ^3/2 ×(2-zr/a°) ×e^-zr/2a° n= 2 ,l=1 2p orbital    R(r) = 1√3×(z/2a°) ^3/2 ×(zr/a°) ×e^-zr/2a ° the rad...
Post a Comment
Read more

Electronegativity scales and disadvantage of scales and its nunericals

Electronegativity scales: 1.Pauling scale of electronegativity: in diatomic molecule (A-B) ,the bond formed between two atoms A and  B will be intermediate between  pure Covalent (A-B)  and pure ionic character,  the bond between A and B will be  strong than bond energy increased. if bond (A-B) has been purily covalent than bond energy can be calculated as average bond energy of bond (A-A)  and bond (B-B).     that means it is equal to bond energy of bond (A-B) E(A-B)  = 1/2[ E(A-A) +E(B-B) ] however experiemental value of bond (A-B)  more than this value  because of difference in electronegativity  of A and B the difference ∆ is given by simple expression ∆ = E(A-B) - 1/2 [E(A-A) +E(B-B) ] where E(A-B)  is experimental value of bond energy. if Ҳ(A)  and  Ҳ(B) are the electronegative of elements A and B than Ҳ(A) - Ҳ(B) = 0.18√∆ for numerical ∆ = E(A-B)  -[√(E(A-A) ×E(B-B) )] Disadvan...
Post a Comment
Read more